Part
/ Feature
|
Detail
|
Engineering
Parameter
|
Hanger cover
|
Function:
-
To hang the
Electric Bug Zapper at the end of table.
|
Material : ABS
Height : 50 mm
Length : 125 mm
Thickness : 1 mm
|
Trapper
|
Function:
-
To gather the
remains of bugs killed.
-
To fill
attractant for mosquitoes
|
Material : ABS
Height : 6.7 mm
Length : 125 mm
Thickness : 3.0 mm
|
Housing
|
Function:
-
To cover the electrical components.
|
Material : ABS
Height : 136mm
Length : 82 mm
Thickness : 2mm
|
Filter
|
Function:
-
To avoid bugs
from escaping from the zapper.
|
Material : ABS
Height : 15.8 mm
Length : 80 mm
Thickness : 1mm
|
Tenon-Mortise joint
|
Function:
-
Work as the joint
|
Material : ABS
Height : 3.4 mm
Diameter : 3.0 mm
|
Snap-fit Calculation
Advantages, Disadvantages and Design Limitations
Description
- Has hanger to hang the bug zapper at the edge of the table for space saving
- Geometric cubic housing for modern aesthetics and easy for storage purpose
- Has half diamond-shaped filter to prevent the bugs from escaping
- Has non-transparent trapper to trap and hide the bugs’ dead bodies
- Has adjustable hanger so that the hanger can fit perfectly at any types of
table
- Can be used for both light-attracted bugs and mosquitoes (mosquito does
not attracted by
light but attractant).
Advantages
- Hygienic
- Safe to use
- Can be used for both bugs and mosquitoes
- Easy to store and clean
Disadvantages
- Need refill the mosquito attractant from time to time
- Need remove the bugs’ dead bodies manually by removing the trapper
Design Modelling
Parts and Detail Drawing
Before going to the 3D
printing, the part of each of the components was drawn with aids of CatiaV5.
There are seven parts were drawn and their details information was labeled with
respect to their tolerance calculated. Below are the example of calculation for
tolerance analysis:
DIM
|
+ve
|
-ve
|
Tolerance
|
Dim1
|
136
|
|
0.1
|
Dim2
|
|
20.5
|
0.05
|
Dim3
|
|
113
|
0.05
|
Dim4
|
|
18
|
0.05
|
Dim5
|
|
15
|
0.05
|
Dim6
|
|
2.7
|
0.05
|
Total
|
136
|
134.5
|
0.35
|
The gap distance between AB:
The
minimum distance = (136-134.5) – 0.35 = 1.15mm
The
maximum distance = (136-134.5) + 0.35 = 1.85mm
Model/ Mockup Fabrication
The drafting were saved
in .stl mode and printed out with using the 3D printing machine. There were
some problem within the modelling process, which that not each parts of the
project was printed due to the limited time and machinery problem. Finally,
only three main parts was successfully printed and one part was fabricated by
using the custom cut acrylic sheet.
Filter
The filter was fabricated
by using the custom cut acrylic sheet. First, the acrylic sheet was labeled
properly. Secondly, cut-off the shape with knife. Then, glued to form shape
with hot glue. Finally, the filter was done!
Housing frame
The
housing frame was fabricated with 3D printing machine. When it was done
printing, there was
some surplus attach on the product. Thus, with aids of
art-use-scissors, the surplus was cut-off and finished with sand paper. Below
was the process of finishing:
Cover
The cover was fabricated
with 3D printing machine. When it was done printing, there was some surplus
attach on the product as shown in Figure 5.3(C). Thus, with aids of
art-use-scissors and knife, the surplus was cut-off and rub with sand paper to
make it smooth. Below was the process of finishing:
Trapper
The trapper was
fabricated with 3D printing machine. The project was rubbed with sand paper to
make it smooth. Below was the process of finishing:
Assembly of the parts:
The figure above shows the assembly process of the bug zapper. First, install the filter into the trapper. Second, install the housing frame onto the trapper. Third, install the electronic components or as known as the transformer onto the housing frame. Then, cover the housing frame with the cover. Thus, the assembly done!
Sustainability Analysis
The material used to make
the product was take into consideration and checked its sustainability with the
aids of Solidworks2014. There were two material used to conduct this analysis,
which were Acrylonitrile
butadiene styrene (ABS) and PP Copolymer.
PP
Copolymer made bug zapper.
Figure 12 shows that the
redesigned bug zapper was generated its sustainability with using the
Solidwork2014. There was some basic information was given, which that the product
was exported from Asia to North America and the exportation required a shipping
distance of 1.24x104km. Also, its recycle rate was only 15%.
However, the weight for the product was 100.79g, which is lighter than the
usual bug zapper.
The result
in Figure 13 shows that the water eutrophication was 2.8x10-4 kg PO4,
air acidification was 3.6x10-3 kg SO2, carbon footprint
was 0.489 kg CO2 and the total energy consumed by the product was
9.9MJ.
Figure 14 shows that the
redesigned bug zapper was generated its sustainability with using the Solidwork2014.
There was some basic information was given, which that the product was exported
from Asia to North America and the exportation required a shipping distance of
1.24x104km. Also, its recycle rate was only 15%. However, the weight
for the product was 115.51g.
Figure 15 shows that the water
eutrophication was 4.3x10-4 kg PO4, air acidification was
4.5x10-3 kg SO2, carbon footprint was 0.747 kg CO2
and the total energy consumed by the product was 13MJ.
Comparisons
Material
|
Environmental
impact
|
Carbon
Footprint
(Kg CO2)
|
Water
Eutrophication
(Kg PO4)
|
Air
Acidification
(Kg SO2)
|
Total Energy
Consumed (MJ)
|
Total
|
Percentage
(%)
|
ABS
|
0.747
|
4.3x10-4
|
4.5x10-3
|
13
|
13.8
|
57.02
|
PP
Copolymer
|
0.489
|
2.8x10-4
|
3.6x10-3
|
9.9
|
10.4
|
42.98
|
Total
|
24.2
|
100
|
Table 6.2.1: The
environmental impact comparison.
From Figure 16 and Figure 17, the comparison result shows that the
PP Copolymer made bug zapper was much better than an ABS made bug zapper in
terms of the material, manufacturing, use, end of life and the transportation
factors. This mean, a PP Copolymer made bug zapper cause less environmental
pollution when compare to the ABS made bug zapper. This happen because the PP Copolymer are much easier to manufacture
and beside it is much recyclable. PP Copolymer tends to have better stress
crack resistance and low temperature toughness than homo-polymer at the expense
of quite small reductions in other properties. The result of the product could
be referred to Table below.
Material Analysis for ABS and PP Copolymer
Storage in life cycle
|
Sustainability strategy
|
ABS
|
PP Copolymer
|
Stage 1:
Extraction and Manufacturing
|
Embodied
energy
|
Own
relatively high embodied energy per unit volume is needed to extract
material. Low processing energy to moulded material once extracted.
|
Own
relatively low embodied energy per unit volume is needed to extract material
as compare to other plastics. Higher processing energy to moulded material
once extracted.
|
Stage 2:
Product Use
|
Aesthetics
and durability
|
Excellent
aesthetic properties and easy to paint and glue. Durable, good strength and
stiffness, good fabricating and machining properties and process low heat
conductivity.
|
Attractive
and aesthetically appealing, excellent strength, toughness and flexibility
over a wide range of temperatures. Excellent impact strength resistance and
good elasticity.
|
Stage 3:
End of life
|
Disassemble
and Recyclability
|
Machines
with ease, low coefficient of friction, corrosion and abrasion resistant,
good chemical resistance and can be recycle
|
Recyclable.
PP Copolymer tends to have better stress crack resistance and low temperature
toughness than homo-polymer at the expense of quite small reductions in other
properties.
|
As a
result, ABS was not the suitable material use to make the bug zapper especially
it was not as recyclable as the PP Copolymer due to it physical and mechanical
properties that causing it to be not that easy to melt or degrade. Also, an ABS
material usually applied in making shell for electronic component due to its
high resistance and high melting point. When comes to making the bug zapper,
there was only a very small area will contact with those electronic component
such as the transformer. In addition, the bug zapper made with PP Copolymer
have better performance because it required low embodied energy per unit volume
to extract material, meaning that the PP Copolymer are suitable to manufacture
and form shape. Plus, it required lower energy and consume less time to
degrade. PP Copolymer tends to have better stress crack resistance and low
temperature toughness than homo-polymer at the expense of quite small
reductions in other properties. Therefore, the PP Copolymer made bug zapper are
much environmental friendly and it reached the sustainability goals.
Economic Analysis
Bill of Materials
Part
/ Feature
|
Material
|
Quantity
|
Price
per Unit ($)
|
Total
Amount ($)
|
Hanger
|
ABS
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
Trapper
|
ABS
|
1
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
Housing frame
|
ABS
|
1
|
2.50
|
2.50
|
Filter
|
ABS
|
1
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
Connector
|
ABS
|
2
|
0.20
|
0.40
|
Wire Gauze
|
Stainless Steel
|
1
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
Ultraviolet Light
|
Borosilicate glass
|
1
|
2.50
|
2.50
|
Tenon-Mortise joint
|
Stainless steel
|
12
|
0.10
|
1.2
|
Transformer
|
Silicon steel
|
1
|
3.00
|
3.00
|
Cable (1m)
|
Conductor: Copper
PVC
|
1
|
1.50
|
1.50
|
Plug
|
ABS
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
Total
|
23
|
13.80
|
15.1
|
Variable Cost to Produce 1 Unit of The Product
Fixed Cost
Return of Investment
Product Warranty
Product Quality Dimension
Performance
For the Electric Bug Zapper, the
performance of the new design was being compared with the original design based
in the current market. A 100% Safe Electric Bug Zapper, no chemicals or
potentially harmful sprays to human were embedded in the product. With a size
of 81mm x 52mm x 12.8 mm, a single high intensity LED UV bulb, a power voltage
of 110V AC, 50 Hz and average power consumption of 2.5 W, the bug zapper is perfect for taking along
during travel due to the compact size.
Durability
The Electric Bug Zapper was designed by
using ABS and PP plastics, the zapper have high endurance even when it falls to
the ground. Using an adapter as power source, the zapper can lasts for 4 hours
in use without overheating. When the zapper is in operation, the amount of
noise is reduced compare to other bug zapper.
Reliability
The Bug Zapper offers a good
after sales service, a 1-year warranty was provided for this product and the
damage done within those period are claimable. Featuring a bright LED UV bulb
that attract mosquito then make contact with an extremely powerful high voltage
electrically charged metal grid, instantly killing them.
Conformance
Electric Bug Zapper committed
to comply with the standards imposed by the Restriction of Hazardous Substances
Directive, which restricts the use of certain hazardous substances in
electrical equipment. It is also complies with the standards imposed by the
Conformance European (CE), a division of the Interfek group.
Aesthetics
The Electric Bug Zapper is equipped with a
trapper that is designed to keep dead mosquitoes and other insects collected
inside the unit, which can then be easily removed for cleaning and bug disposal
by gently shaking them. Available in the colour black, the bug zapper appears
to look modern and simple and is easy to carry and use. Just clamp the device
onto any table and it’s good to go. The effective coverage is about 20 square
meters.
Perceived
Quality
Electric Bug Zapper is powerful but quiet
with PCB design which proves that the product eco-friendly. There is no harmful
radiation, non-toxic quiet and safe to humans and pets. The product is
recommended for outdoor use, particularly at restaurants that have outdoor
dining tables. It also have low power consumption when it is in active-off mode.
Due to electric shock danger, the users were advised not to touch the high
voltage grids when in use and keep it away from children.
Product Warranties of Electrical Bug Zapper
Future Recommendations and Improvements
For
the designed Electric Bug Zapper, there are still a few improvements that can
be made for future uses. One is to install a larger trapper for the biting
insects to be kept. By increasing the size of the trapper, this will reduce the
frequency on how many times it takes for user to empty the trapper. Another idea for future improvement is to
add a fan to aid the dead biting insects to fall down into the trapper. The
added fan will suck down the dead insects that were stuck on the wire grid. By
adding a fan to the design, there will be less dead biting insects stuck on the
wire grid, thus increasing the efficiency of killing them.
Apart from that, the current design for
the Electric Bug Zapper are not foldable. This can become an idea for an
improvement. By making the zapper become foldable, it will not consume much
space in the suitcase when carrying them around during travel. When changing
the zapper to be able to fold, it must come with a customized case to keep the
parts safe when packing them in the suitcase, thus making the use of the zapper
a lot easier for users.
Another improvement that can implemented
for future design is to make the design of Electric Bug Zapper easy to assemble
and disassemble. This idea can be done by adding more snap-fits into the design
itself. For example, the casing and the trapper can be assemble and disassemble
easily when snap-fit is used to bind them together.
Conclusion
Bug
zapper, those sizzling glowing fixtures in many restaurants, kill billions of
insect every year, but still biting insects are lingering around us to some
point that it became annoying. Based on a research done by Dr Douglas W.
Tallamy, an entomologist in Newark, out of 13,789 dead bugs caught by the
zapper, only 31 were biting flies. Nearly all the neighborhoods’ biting flies
remained on the wing to torment the zapper’s owners. By redesigning the bug
zapper, the number of biting flies can be increased by simply placing the
zapper near the user. In order to design a more efficient bug zapper compared
to the ones in the market, many procedures were done. Some of them were problem
identification, concept generation and selection of the new design, design
modelling and FMEA.
Based on the findings, a
few ideas were found. As the current design consumed space when placed on the
table, the new designed zapper’s position were a crucial point, and as a
result, the new designed bug zapper will be placed beside a table, clamped. By
doing this, the zapper can kill more biting flies in the hidden areas such as
under the table. An addition to that, the bug zapper also implemented a
mosquito attractant that mimics the human breathe to increase the number of
dead biting insects. Apart from that, a filter that prevent the trapped insects
in the zapper from coming out again was also added in the new design bug
zapper.
While the current bug
zapper do work, it was not nearly well enough to make them worthwhile if the
number of dead biting insects were still significant. By improving the design
and its function, the number of dead biting insects might increases, thus
making the user felt free without having to worry about these annoying insects
biting them while enjoying their meal.